<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micro Book Review: The Definitive Guide to Terracotta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-224919</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkeyism.com/?p=633#comment-224919</guid>
		<description>&quot;[...] that&#039;s my nano review format for commenting on blogs.&quot; Hehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[...] that&#8217;s my nano review format for commenting on blogs.&#8221; Hehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Iry</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-224918</link>
		<dc:creator>James Iry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkeyism.com/?p=633#comment-224918</guid>
		<description>Nope, can&#039;t elaborate, that&#039;s my nano review format for commenting on blogs.  :-)  

Actually it was a joke.  I think it&#039;s fine to omit chapter listings, especially if you link to the publisher&#039;s page.  More pros and cons are always good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, can&#8217;t elaborate, that&#8217;s my nano review format for commenting on blogs.  :-)  </p>
<p>Actually it was a joke.  I think it&#8217;s fine to omit chapter listings, especially if you link to the publisher&#8217;s page.  More pros and cons are always good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-224914</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkeyism.com/?p=633#comment-224914</guid>
		<description>Why? Could you elaborate?

When I read review e.g. on slashdot I most often jump to the conclusion. When on Amazon I read one good review and several 1 star reviews to see if I like the product. The sort ones are enough for me (for the content I go to the table of content).

Would you like more cons/pros? More on the content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? Could you elaborate?</p>
<p>When I read review e.g. on slashdot I most often jump to the conclusion. When on Amazon I read one good review and several 1 star reviews to see if I like the product. The sort ones are enough for me (for the content I go to the table of content).</p>
<p>Would you like more cons/pros? More on the content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Iry</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/micro-book-review-the-definitive-guide-to-terracotta/comment-page-1/#comment-224909</link>
		<dc:creator>James Iry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codemonkeyism.com/?p=633#comment-224909</guid>
		<description>&gt; What do you think about this short review style?

Feelings mixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; What do you think about this short review style?</p>
<p>Feelings mixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
