the blog for developers

Java Interview questions: Write a String Reverser (and use Recursion!)

Interviewing developers for a programming job is hard and tedious. There are some excellent Guides, like the Joel Guerilla Guide to interviewing, but in the end you need to decide yourself to hire or not to hire. To get a quick idea about their programming abilities I have considered asking the String reverse question. Others have used this question with some success. There are lots of answers to this question which gives you room to explore the candidates skills. Thinking about this myself, I found some answers on how to reverse a String in Java. The answer the candidate gives is a good way to see how he thinks. You could combine this question with one about interfaces and ask for a reverser interface:

public interface Reverser {
  public String reverse(String str);
}

The best implementation in Java is to use the reverse method of the StringBuffer class in the JDK. It’s fast, efficient and knows how to handle unicode surrogate pairs, something most other solutions ignore.

public class JdkReverser implements Reverser {
       public String reverse(String str) {
            if ((null == str) || (str.length() <= 1)) {
                return str;
            }
            return new StringBuffer(str).reverse().toString();
        }
}

Not only is the chosen implementation interesting as an answer, but also does the candidate reuse the JDK or not or does he tell you at least "there has to be something in the JDK". Which is quite as good, because googling in reality will help him find the JDK solution. You don't want developers to implement everything themselves.

Handling problems

Ask him where the bug is in this code, even if there is none. Or how his code can go wrong. His answers can lead into a discussion about how to handle a null value

  • return null
  • return ""
  • throw NullPointerException
  • throw IllegalArgumentException

and the merits of every solution. The second discussion point is how to optimize the solution, like returning the string itself for "" and every one length string (which is a reversal of itself already).

Recursion

Then ask the candidate to write a recursive solution of the reversal problem (which is the most beautiful but least usable one).

        public String reverse(String str) {
            if ((null == str) || (str.length()  <= 1)) {
                return str;
            }
            return reverse(str.substring(1)) + str.charAt(0);
        }

Some developers can't handle recursion in their head. Most candidates will need some time and some help, but actually get to a solution. Those that can't handle several stages of recursion in their head probably can't handle complex problems or several layers in their head either.

You can ask them about the efficiency of the recursive solution, ask about Tail Recursion, ask about the ineffeciency of the "+" operation for Strings, how to handle that, about why Strings are immutable (most of the time at least) and ask the candidate how many String objects are created for reversing "Stephan" with his recursive solution. When discussing this one of my developers said "Easy", he was doing Lisp at the university the whole time, which I didn't know until then, excellent news!

Ask where the stop condition is in the above code to end the recursion.

More solutions

Some more solutions, one with swapping a StringBuffer in place:

        public String reverse(String str) {
            if ((null == str) || (str.length()  <= 1 )) {
                return str;
            }
            StringBuffer result = new StringBuffer(str);
            for (int i = 0; i < (str.length() / 2); i++) {
                int swapIndex = str.length() - 1 - i;
                char swap = result.charAt(swapIndex);
                result.setCharAt(swapIndex, result.charAt(i));
                result.setCharAt(i, swap);
            }
            return result.toString();
        }

One with swapping an array:

        public String reverse(String str) {
            if ((null == str) || (str.length() <= 1)) {
                return str;
            }
            char[] chars = str.toCharArray();
            int right = chars.length - 1;
            for (int left = 0; left < right; left++) {
                char swap = chars[left];
                chars[left] = chars[right];
                chars[right--] = swap;
            }
            return new String(chars);
        }

and one with appending to a StringBuffer:

        public String reverse(String str) {
            if ((null == str) || (str.length() <= 1)) {
                return str;
            }
            StringBuffer reverse = new StringBuffer(str.length());
            for (int i = str.length() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
              reverse.append(str.charAt(i));
            }
            return reverse.toString();
        }
    }

Perhaps the candidate even knows about the tricky XOR swapping solution.

From there it's an open field. You could ask the candidate to write a JUnit test for his reverse method. Not only can he show how to write a unit test, but what he considers as test cases ("", null, "A", "Even", "Odd", ....).

I hope this helps you in your decision with hire or no hire. And I hope it helps me in the future to decide this question for myself. As Joel said: when in doubt, always no hire.

Thanks for listening.

See also:

About the author

stephan Stephan Schmidt has been working with internet technologies for the last 20 years. He was head of development, consultant and CTO and is a speaker, author and blog writer. He specializes in organizing and optimizing software development helping companies by increasing productivity with lean software development and agile methodologies. Want to know more? All views are only his own. You can find him on Google +

You can leave a Reply here. Of course, you should follow me on twitter here.

You can share this post!
Do you want to tell others about this article? Use the social bookmark icons to submit this artice to the service of your choice. Thanks.

Leave a reply.

Comments

fw

since java 5 the -operator ist no longer inefficient:

“The Java language provides special support for the string concatenation operator ( ), and for conversion of other objects to strings. String concatenation is implemented through the StringBuilder(or StringBuffer) class and its append method”

stephan

Hello fw,

this depends. I don’t think the java compiler can use StringBuffer for the given recursion, it’s only possible to detect easy cases of String usage currently. So

"Person: " \+ name \+  " with age: " \+  age

will be converted to a StringBuffer by the javac compiler,

 return reverse(str.substring(1)) \+  str.charAt(0);

probably not, unless the compiler or the JIT VM have some very, very smart escape analysis.

Carsten

Great post! It gave me some fun minutes to code some methods myself. I have to check which solutions I did. The recursive one was really fun, but I had to think about it for a minute before starting to code it. Actually what first comes to my mind was the good old self-swapping in a char[]. :-) I put that as a remaining of my electrotechnical background.

Actually, I prefer the JDK provided methods and I definitly would have taken a look into the API before starting to code that in a real project. Relying on the JDK is one of my most-liked parts of Java.

stephan

Hi Carsten, thanks :-) The first one that came to my mind was appending to a StringBuffer. I have an aversion agains arrays somehow. But perhaps in the end I would choose the swap solution with an array, it should be the fastest. When looking at the StringBuffer.reverse() function in the JDK, it’s not easy to implement though to work correctly with surrogate pairs.

I thought there was such a function in String and was searching for it, there I found StringBuffer.reverse.

Actually i came up with this version.Hope i am not in the list of dummy’s.

Thanks
Prashant
http://prashantjalasutram.blogspot.com/

public class StringReverser {

static String orgStr = "prasanth";

static char[] orgCharArr = orgStr.toCharArray();

static char[] distCharArr = new char[orgStr.length()];

static int endCounter = orgCharArr.length – 1;

static int startCounter = 0;

static StringBuffer output = new StringBuffer();

public static void main(String[] args) {
String orginalString = "pras";
char[] reverseStr=reverse(orgCharArr);
System.out.println(reverseStr);
}

static char[] reverse(char[] org) {

distCharArr[endCounter]=orgCharArr[startCounter];

if(endCounter<=0 || startCounter>=orgStr.length()) {
return distCharArr;
}else {
startCounter ;
endCounter–;
return reverse(orgCharArr);
}

}}

[...] About Reposita development. No signal, no noise. « Java Interview questions: Write a String Reverser (and use Recursion!) [...]

wintermute

prashant: Hehe. Was that a joke?

stephan

Wintermut.

It might be a bit out of topic but, what about asking for any participation in open source projects? Or isn’t that very relevant?

Witek

You should use tail recurions.

Example in Erlang:

reverse(X) ->
reverse(X, []).

reverse([A|Rest], Acc) ->
reverse(Rest, A Acc);
reverse([], Acc) ->
Acc.

This should take constant stack space.

stephan

@Witek: My example uses tail recursion.

@Paulo: Yes, off topic for this post, not off topic for interviewing. Asking about Open Source projects is a good idea. I would prefer a candidate who is participating in Open Source projects, good idea.

PXM

No, your example isn’t tail recursive. Your recursive call is

return reverse(str.substring(1)) + str.charAt(0);

So the stack frame has to stay around to do the append on the recursive result. To make this tail recursive you need to pass in an accumulator like Witek’s solution.

stephan

@PXM: Ah thanks. Every new day something new to learn.

@Witek: Sorry for my ill informed reply.

Leo

“text”.reverse in Ruby LOL

stephan

@Leo: “text”.reverse in Groovy

This does not help, as the main reason for the question is the discussion on why the developer has chosen the particular solution.

So obviously I would ask a different question when interviewing Ruby developers.

Or Javascript developers.

Or Lisp developers.

Or did I missunderstand your comment and it was another “Ruby rulez Java” comment?

Leo

it was a joke… and yes i do like ruby and no there is no one solves all Rulez anywhere really so not about to start another flame war.

On the programmers interviews though, I like to ask about their experiences in a practical sense and have them explain to me parts of projects they have worked on. Not puzzles like this one you are outlining here.

Greetz

Leo

stephan

I don’t consider writing a reverse String function a puzzler. Man hole covers are. Writing code is not. “This does not help, as the main reason for the question is the discussion on why the developer has chosen the particular solution.” No puzzler there.

Obviously one would ask the candidate about past projects, his roles in these projects, his view on technologies, testing, quality assurance, requirement engineering, his social skills and much more. Asking one programming question is only a small part of an interview process.

Gr33tZ
-stephan

Unimpressed

Hmm.. Your stupid recursion solution only handles strings less than 65536 chars in length due to the call stack depth limit.

stephan

@Unimpressed: I’m not impressed by your comment either. As written before the recursive solution isn’t very good for Java and Unicode reversal because Java has immutable Strings which will make you run out of memory faster than the call stack and Unicode has surrogate pairs which will make your reversed string unreadable.

But go ahead, write a tail recursive version. Which will not help, because Java does not optimize tail recursion.

Nils

“Java does not optimize tail recursion”. Too broad statement. Sun’s VM does not.
IBM’s VM optimizes tail recursion into iteration.

stephan

I’ve been googling around, found some mentions of tail recursion and tail call elimination in IBM VMs but no official description. The most I found from IBM were some academic papers on the topic. So I didn’t mention IBMs VM. Have you found a description of tail recursion/call elimination in IBMs VM? I would be highly interested.

Jude

Ask the candidate to implement String reversal using recursion . Now that would boil down to some sort of tail recursion . If the aim is to test the candidate’s Recursion capabilities , then i think tail recursion and such a question is a bad choice .

Tail recursion should be best avoided , in such cases an iterative solution is much much better . Fibonacci series ( iterative vs recursion ) has been discussed a zillion times .

I feel its best to ask recursive problems that truly are recursive without being tail recursive .

Before reversing a “string”, we need to get clear on what we want. At one level, a Java String object is just an array of chars. At another level, it represents a sequence of unicode code points. The tension arises from the fact that String(char[]) lets you construct a string with a sequence of chars that don’t correspond to valid unicode code points. This tension was ratcheted up in the 1.5 JDK when they moved to Unicode 4.0.

In the 1.5 JDK, Sun changed the behavior of the StringBuffer.reverse() method in a way that was not backward compatible with 1.4. That is, there are StringBuffer instances for which reverse() in 1.4 returns a different value than in 1.5.

The 1.5 version of reverse() is sensitive to surrogate pairs (unicode code points requiring more than 16 bits, and hence more than one char, in UTF-16). In 1.5, both java.lang.StringBuilder and java.lang.StringBuffer use the implementation of reverse() from their common superclass, java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.

Here’s the first paragraph of doc for java.lang.StringBuffer.reverse() from JDK 1.5:

“Causes this character sequence to be replaced by the reverse of the sequence. If there are any surrogate pairs included in the sequence, these are treated as single characters for the reverse operation. Thus, the order of the high-low surrogates is never reversed.”

And here’s the first paragraph of doc from java.lang.StringBuffer.reverse() from JDK 1.4:

“The character sequence contained in this string buffer is replaced by the reverse of the sequence.”

Following Stephan’s suggestion to use the built-in has either a good or bad side effect. Moving from 1.4 to 1.5 either breaks backward compatibility for the string as char sequence representation, or appropriately handles unicode 5.0 in the string as sequence of code points representation.

Extra credit 1: Recursion won’t work because it’ll blow out the stack if we’re using Sun’s JDKs, which (at least so far) don’t perform tail recursion optimization (a kind of last call optimization).

Extra credit 2: The exception thrown when trying to reverse a null string should be a null pointer exception. That’s how Sun codes the JDK itself (see, e.g., the java.lang.String.String(String) constructor). It’s a runtime exception because it’s a coding error to send reverse(String) a null string (assuming you want behavior like your call to StringBuffer.reverse()). It should be a null pointer exception, as that’ll lead you right to the problem while debugging.

Do I get a callback for a second interview?

[...] I’m cross-posting what was mostly a response to reading Stephans Blog [sic], which was itself a riff on Joel on Software’s Guerilla Guide to Interviewing. Both ask us to look at the string reverse problem. [...]

stephan

“Do I get a callback for a second interview?” Sure ;-) Thanks for the long comment. We usually do a face to face as a second one.

“The exception thrown when trying to reverse a null string should be a null pointer exception.”

I’m not certain on this one. Developers search for the cause of NPEs by looking for dots which dereference references. So throwing a NPE when there is no null pointer access doesn’t help. I also think that throwing an NPE for

int i = (Integer) null;

was a wrong decision on Suns side. A AutoUnboxingException would have been more helpful and make this error much easier to detect.

I’ve added a tail recursive version here

http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2007/11/12/string-reversing-part-ii-tail-recursion/

Good interview Questions can be found at http://java4all.info

Kiran Talawai

/* The following code works fine in reverse the string without the stack interface
*/

public static void main(String[] args) {
String str=”This. is Mruthyu”;
String temp=”";
StringTokenizer stk = new StringTokenizer(str);
String arr[] = new String[stk.countTokens()];
while(stk.hasMoreElements()){
for(int k=0;k0&&m>=m-1;m–){
temp=temp+” “+arr[m-1];

}
System.out.println(“MMMMM”+temp);
}

Kiran Talawai

public static void main(String[] args) {
String str=”This. is Mruthyu”;
String temp=”";
StringTokenizer stk = new StringTokenizer(str);
String arr[] = new String[stk.countTokens()];
while(stk.hasMoreElements()){
for(int k=0;k0&&m>=m-1;m–){
temp=temp+” “+arr[m-1];

}
System.out.println(“MMMMM”+temp);
}

am

Kiran:

your solution has terrible performance characteristics.

Never do this:

for(int k=0;k0&&m>=m-1;m–){
temp=temp+” “+arr[m-1];

}

Repeated concatenation in Java is VERY SLOW. You end up doing O(N2) character copies because of the implicit StringBuilders..

The correct way to do it is:

StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder(str.length());
for (…) {
temp.append(arr[m-1]);
}

return temp.toString();

This avoids n(n-1)/2 character copies instead of just n.

stephan

@am: Please go back and read the article.

“The best implementation in Java is to use the reverse method of the StringBuffer class in the JDK. It’s fast, efficient and knows how to handle unicode surrogate pairs, something most other solutions ignore.”

Thanks
Stephan

Kiran Talawai

Thanks am,
Thanks for ur suggestion.. :-)

Andreas

Maybe missed it, but just wanted to show one (!) end-tail-rekursion-solution:

public static String reverse(String toReverse) {
return reverse(toReverse, “”);
}

private static String reverse(String toReverse, String reverse) {
if (toReverse == null || reverse.length() == toReverse.length()) {
return reverse;
}
reverse += toReverse.charAt(toReverse.length() – reverse.length() – 1);
return reverse(toReverse, reverse);
}

pranav

this is a ridiculous interview question. i was asked this question for a senior developer position. i did not know about the stringbuffer class. does that mean i cannot do java? i have developed complex algorithms in java – but the interviewer did not even look at my resume after asking this question. it is a ridiculous way to judge somebody.

it was a waste of time commuting all the way and not being asked a single question about my role at my current job.

you do not need to know these low level things, if you get the big picture. these kind of questions are good for college tests which have nothing to do with real world. in real life, you will never sit and reverse a string.

i hate when interviewers try to be too geeky. that’s why they have 10+ years of exp and they still are coding reporting to a non-techy person who knows nothing about computers.

@Pranav: But I assume – withouth the knowledge of StringBuffer – you had no problem writing a reverse() method and everything was ok?

Tony

Hi Stephan, I agree with pranav, but also see your point in thinking how will you use a language to solve a problem.

Although I know StringBuffer I have used it for appending strings. I did write a string reverser just converted the string into an array of char read the contents into another char array converted back into a String. There are quite a few ways to solve it.

But gettinh back to pranav with all the new frameworks, doing a lot of the work for you, the skill will/should be, what framework would you choose and why.

Would/why would you use ORM.

Coding to java patterns.

The problems related to mixing framworks.

There is so much java technology out there. So many different frameworks and even different versions.

Updating JAXB recently a lot of the JAXB related functions stopped working.

This happens a lot, a good interview is to ask the developer what would they do, how would they go about solving this problem or making sure the problem does not happen in the first place.

I find when I am preparing for java interviews, I need to remove my java head and put on my old C coding head.

Pa

This really off course and completely unpractical. It is barely a college homework assignment. Java technology is a very wide field of practice.
It has no relevance to knowledge of what really does the job these days. These are frameworks and how to bind them into secure, stable and performing solutions. One should have knowledge of good Java practices and GoF on such low levels.

G. Edwin

Simply put each char in a stack until you get to the end of string / new line char.

Then pop them out. This is the best way to reverse a string.

–Edwin.

[...] Excellent article to further understand more about how this code works. [...]

Santosh

public class StringReverseExample
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
String s1=”Hello”;
String s2=”";
System.out.println(“\nString before reverse:”+s1);
for(int i=s1.length()-1;i>=0;i–)
{
s2=s2+ s1.charAt(i);

}
System.out.println(“String after reverse:”+s2);
}
}

Great post. so full information. thanks

Kristen

great post! This was alot of fun to code..
my solution was similar but required fewer calls. it basically works from the outside in.

public String reverse(String s) {
//work outside in, swap e and a..then return inner substring
if(s != null && s.length() > 1) {
return s.charAt(s.length()-1) + reverse(s.substring(1, s.length()-1)) + s.charAt(0);
}
return s;
}

Jasper

Interviewing Technique:

First 10 Minutes:
—————–
1. Always FIRST try to understand WHAT the developer KNOWS. Do not focus on What the developer DOES NOT KNOW.

2. Make the developer TALK about things he has WORKED ON. Be Supportive.

Next 10 Minutes:
—————-
3. Ask Questions on topics THAT developer had indeed worked on.

Last 10 Minutes:
—————-
4. Ask questions on things You would like. Your pre-meditated questions should come here.

This way you do not pre-judge a candidate based on your questions. The developer feels that you did study his resume.

—-
I have attended interview where in the first 5 minutes Two puzzle/algorithm like questions were asked (Bubble Sort algorithm, 5-red balls kind of thing). Since i did not answer satisfactorily NO OTHER QUESTIONS were further asked. And i felt thoroughly cheated.

I have interviewed many people, found that people who are able to answer WHAT THEY WORKED ON SATISFACTORILY are usually better in the long-run, than one’s who know a few so-called-smart answers – the latter people even if smart – fail to deliver projects.

My lengthy two cents. :)

You can explore the candidates skills reviewing his string reverser?

Mina

“Those that can’t handle several stages of recursion in their head probably can’t handle complex problems or several layers in their head either.”

If the person being interviewed graduated from a university with a computer science degree, they can “handle complex problems or several layers in their head.” How else does they get through computer science coursework?

It is random what we’re asked at interviews. You might make great decisions about how to code things you’ve done on-the-job but not do well on random things asked in an interview that you haven’t thought about in a long time.

You can study for 3 days for an important interview and then not be able to answer a question on something the interviewer randomly took off p. 325 of the manual.

In the old days,interviewing managers assumed that programmers knew how to write code and that whatever they didn’t know on the job they would simply look up. That’s why we have all those code books lined up on a shelf above our desks.

I don’t know how interviews have become just trying to trick the candidate into exposing himself as a code fraud. It does not reflect well on the manager.

Jason

@mina 100% agree.

EH

This is a good test if your goal is to filter for formally-trained CS people.

My question to the interviewer in response to tests like these would be to ask when the last time programmers at the company had to hand-build a string reverser, or ask them the role it plays in their development. The answer to that is a measure of the utility of the test.

Mel

StringBuffer is not the best answer. StringBuffer is a re-entrant class which incurs a locking price for all operations. The StringBuilder class provides the same functions without the locking price. Since the variable is being used in a monothreaded way, StringBuilder is a better answer here.

Rudy

Stephen.

I’d like to ask you to step back just for a minute here and try to take in the big picture of what it is you are doing and recommending to others to do as well.
You have had a countless number of hours and days to explore and implement this reversal algorithm and at the comfort of your desk. And you are calling on the interviewee to be able to reproduce the same in the span of several seconds all the while undergoing the extremely stressful and uncomfortable procedure of a job interview. Where one is judged and interrogated and is presumed to be found lacking until proven otherwise.
And in the end even if the person succeeds to have memorized the solution and fire it back to you what have you really learned about the prospect. Above you mentioned that this is not meant to be a puzzler, as you worded it, but is meant as a discussion point of further techniques. However, it does not succeed in this regard, as it has already taken an interview to completely different and I might add completely irrelevant realm. In the end and in the beginning it is simply a memorization drilling, for this technique or that with the memorization of Java API included to boot. Like Pranav I’ve been to interviews like this, and ran as fast and as far as I could from the employer.
Of course, if you are simply looking for a coder who is able to memorize things, this should land you the desired candidate but it cannot reveal the persons way of thinking or reasoning.

class reversestring
{
public static void main(String arg[])
{
String s=”RAMESH”;
String reverse=new StringBuffer.reverse().toString();
System.out.println(“String=”+s);
System.out.println(“Reverse=”+reverse);
}
}

@EH: I don’t think this test for CS skills but for programming skills. Deconstructing a problem into smaller problems and translating these into computer constructs.

@Rudy: I think you’ve got it wrong. Writing a String reverse method should be possible for every programmer, no need to memorize a solution.

Indeed, if people would memorize solutions and write those down, I’d rather not call them programmers.

Jonnel

I have a simple solutions for reversing a string.. :)

import java.util.Scanner;

public class StringReverser {

public static void main (String args []){

Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println(“Please enter a word: “);
String str = input.nextLine();

int value = str.length() – 1;
for(int x = value; x>=0 ; x–){
System.out.print(str.charAt(x));
}
}
}

Richard

In spite of what people say about this question, It still is a favorite question. Had to do it in C# for a recent interview. They didn’t specify the method. So I did an iterative in place reversal as well as doing it using the .NET reverse method.

But even I disagree about the Recursion part. Most folks who have tons of experience hardly use recursion and are rusty with its concepts. IMO it would be bad to judge candidates based on whether they can give complex recursive solutions. But then again, you have every right to determine what you want.

Gabo Mexico

- Using charAt() is similar to String.length() they are very expensive and the performance will be affected. You should avoid them specially into loops.

- Convert to char array using toCharArray() and iterate the for loop instead.

- charArray.length will not invoke any method since it is the atribute and not a method.

- When calling StringBuffer or its faster version as Java 1.5 “StringBulder” takes valuables resources.
We should understand that the cost involved in invoking methods are:

a) Actual transfer of the control.
b) Parameter and return values passing.
c) Establishment of stack frame for local variables.

This is a very simple an efficient solution:

public String reverseString (String str) {
if (str == null || “”.equals(str)) {
return str;
}

char[] charArray = str.toCharArray();
char[] swap = new char[charArray.length];
int len = charArray.length – 1;

for (int i = len; i >= 0; i–) {
swap[i] = charArray[len - i];
}
return new String(swap);

}

Best regards!
gabo

Moses

I had an interview two days ago and I was asked to code in several ways on this string reverser test. I gave one using StringBuilder and String’s charAt() and moved on to next question.
Here brings one thing I has been puzzled for a long time: Asking candidate to write code on such test is not an effective way to interview candidates. This is a lazy way to interview. This is used by interviewers who are afraid to ask candidates’ work/projects, which are not familiar by the interviewers.
I am active looking for a new opportunity and figure out that I need to refresh myself to pass those tests, even though I have more than 10 years Java experience and haven’t encountered a java coding chanllenge yet.

When I interview candidates, I only asked the questions related to candidate’s work experience. I want to find out how deep a candidate understand the projects he/she worked on. I would adjust questions so I could effectively measure where is a candidate’s knowledge.

Ben

Interview should focus on if a person can solve a problem. The best way to find it out is to read the resume and ask how and why the solve the problem described in the resume.

I found a lot interviews just starting with a lot questions. If the person happens do not know the answer, the person will fail. However, in the real life, how a person knows every thing. At work, we face a lot deadlines, we have to focus on the job. Get home, we need to take care the family.

However we have ability to solve the problem. If there is a problem, we do not know, we will google it, try the solution.

I have more that 12 years developing experience and i did a lot big projects. But I hate the interview with code and sql. I am sure that I will fail in the on site coding. If the question like this, I would think that why they ask the question is so simple and what they want to test, that makes me think too much.

In the problem like this, should check if the parameter is null or not? Should be always pessimistic, should the client to use the method to check?

Should you always remember the sql, how many people use sql every day, even once a week?

I would like always test if the person know what he/she has done.

Leave a Reply

What people wrote somewhere else:

Additional comments powered by BackType

Guide to CodeMonkeyism

Over the last 4 years I wrote many articles on this blog. To make it easier for you to find the relevant ones, I've organized them into topics.

Top 10

6 reasons why my VC funded startup did fail

Go Ahead: Next Generation Java Programming Style

Java Interview questions: Write a String Reverser

The dark side of NoSQL

7 Bad Signs not to Work for a Software Company or Startup

Is Java dead?

Scala vs. Clojure

Never, never, never use String in Java

No future for functional programming in 2008 – Scala, F# and Nu

Clojure vs Scala, Part 2

Java Developer

Is Java Dead?

Go Ahead: Next Generation Java Programming Style

Be careful with magical code

All variables in Java must be final

Never, never, never use String in Java

Bending Java: More readable code with methods that do nothing?

NoSQL Guy

NoSQL: The Dawn of Polyglot Persistence

The dark side of NoSQL

Essential storage tradeoff: Simple Reads vs. Simple Writes

Sharding destroys the goals of your relational database

The unholy legacy of databases

Startup/CTO

Development Dream Teams

6 reasons why my VC funded startup did fail

American vs. European style of Software Development

12 Things to Reduce Your Lead Time and Time to Market

The high cost of overhead when working in parallel

Essential storage tradeoff: Simple Reads vs. Simple Writes

Job Seeker

Another Good (Java) Interview Question

7 Bad Signs not to Work for a Software Company or Startup

Java Interview questions: Write a String Reverser (and use Recursion!)

Java Interview questions: Multiple Inheritance

As a Manager: What I value in developers

Top 10 Tips (+1) to Get a Pay Raise

Agilist

What Developers Need to Know About Agile

5 Practices Better to Change in Your Scrum Implementation

Scrum is not about engineering practices

ScrumMaster and ZenMaster: The joke of certification

What is Trans-Scrum?