<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Google up to?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codemonkeyism.com/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More data for Google via their DNS servers &#124; crealytics Blog</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/comment-page-1/#comment-270266</link>
		<dc:creator>More data for Google via their DNS servers &#124; crealytics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codemonkeyism.com/?p=1550#comment-270266</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Stephan Schmidt from codemonkeyism! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Stephan Schmidt from codemonkeyism! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/comment-page-1/#comment-268744</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codemonkeyism.com/?p=1550#comment-268744</guid>
		<description>@Mohan: I think Gmail for now is safe because of HTTPS, but I&#039;m not sure Google will keep it that way.

I also hope the second one is dropped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mohan: I think Gmail for now is safe because of HTTPS, but I&#8217;m not sure Google will keep it that way.</p>
<p>I also hope the second one is dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan Arun L (@marun2 on Twitter)</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/comment-page-1/#comment-268738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan Arun L (@marun2 on Twitter)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codemonkeyism.com/?p=1550#comment-268738</guid>
		<description>I often open Spam email in gmail to check if they are legitimate spam before deleting them. Do you mean to say gmail tries to do DNS prefetching for the spam links embedded in such spam if I open them? I assume all gmail operates these days in https:// mode and the url also begins with https:// in my browser. Can you clarify?

I hope the second proposal is dropped. If authoritative DNS servers see their clients IP addresses, then they are also going to log them, another privacy breach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often open Spam email in gmail to check if they are legitimate spam before deleting them. Do you mean to say gmail tries to do DNS prefetching for the spam links embedded in such spam if I open them? I assume all gmail operates these days in https:// mode and the url also begins with https:// in my browser. Can you clarify?</p>
<p>I hope the second proposal is dropped. If authoritative DNS servers see their clients IP addresses, then they are also going to log them, another privacy breach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNS-Prefetch could be a security leak in emails? - Dennis&#39; Blog of Indiscriminate</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/comment-page-1/#comment-268612</link>
		<dc:creator>DNS-Prefetch could be a security leak in emails? - Dennis&#39; Blog of Indiscriminate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codemonkeyism.com/?p=1550#comment-268612</guid>
		<description>[...] Ref: http://codemonkeyism.com/google/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ref: http://codemonkeyism.com/google/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Casino</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/google/comment-page-1/#comment-268448</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Casino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codemonkeyism.com/?p=1550#comment-268448</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this is such a bad thing: the client&#039;s IP address would be truncated to the top 24 bit, afaik, so the client remains anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is such a bad thing: the client&#8217;s IP address would be truncated to the top 24 bit, afaik, so the client remains anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/16 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: codemonkeyism.com @ 2012-02-09 02:16:07 -->
