<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current code coverage tools (for maven)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-141170</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-141170</guid>
		<description>Clover is excellent. 

If I&#039;d have enough money for Clover, I&#039;d buy Clover, no discussions about that. I&#039;m certain that it&#039;s worth the price.

If I don&#039;t have the money - well I don&#039;t have it. I need something else ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clover is excellent. </p>
<p>If I&#8217;d have enough money for Clover, I&#8217;d buy Clover, no discussions about that. I&#8217;m certain that it&#8217;s worth the price.</p>
<p>If I don&#8217;t have the money &#8211; well I don&#8217;t have it. I need something else ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Moore</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-141135</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-141135</guid>
		<description>Before you write Clover2 off altogether keep in mind that it isn&#039;t really comparable to Emma/Corbutura - per test coverage is worth it&#039;s weight in gold. As well as solid maven integration the intellij plugin http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=132 is very slick compared to the built in stuff.

It sucks that it is expensive, but those 30 day evals are pretty easy to get ;)

[I&#039;m of course biased being from the Clover team]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you write Clover2 off altogether keep in mind that it isn&#8217;t really comparable to Emma/Corbutura &#8211; per test coverage is worth it&#8217;s weight in gold. As well as solid maven integration the intellij plugin <a href="http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=132" rel="nofollow">http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=132</a> is very slick compared to the built in stuff.</p>
<p>It sucks that it is expensive, but those 30 day evals are pretty easy to get ;)</p>
<p>[I'm of course biased being from the Clover team]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-131216</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-131216</guid>
		<description>Then Teamcity, here we come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then Teamcity, here we come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-130984</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-130984</guid>
		<description>I second french_c, we do use Teamcity with maven2, code inspections servser side and remote runs for commits. The only drawback of course is that we did not settled yet on a final set of inspections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second french_c, we do use Teamcity with maven2, code inspections servser side and remote runs for commits. The only drawback of course is that we did not settled yet on a final set of inspections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Porter</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-130654</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-130654</guid>
		<description>IDEA uses EMMA under the hood so you might want to give it a second look. I haven&#039;t tried their Maven integration recently but I know there is a plugin out there for it.

On the other hand, while Cobertura isn&#039;t progressing at a very rapid speed, the functionality that is there works pretty well already and is what I still use most of the time. Not having it in the IDE is a drawback though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IDEA uses EMMA under the hood so you might want to give it a second look. I haven&#8217;t tried their Maven integration recently but I know there is a plugin out there for it.</p>
<p>On the other hand, while Cobertura isn&#8217;t progressing at a very rapid speed, the functionality that is there works pretty well already and is what I still use most of the time. Not having it in the IDE is a drawback though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-130578</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-130578</guid>
		<description>Good idea, didn&#039;t think of that, would be an excuse to try TeamCity (which I wanted to try since I&#039;ve first heard of ... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, didn&#8217;t think of that, would be an excuse to try TeamCity (which I wanted to try since I&#8217;ve first heard of &#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: french_c</title>
		<link>http://codemonkeyism.com/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/comment-page-1/#comment-130565</link>
		<dc:creator>french_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.reposita.org/archives/2008/07/17/current-code-coverage-tools-for-maven/#comment-130565</guid>
		<description>If you are about to spend money you might consider looking into teamcity. You get Idea code inspections and maven2 serverside. 

.oO(Since I did not test teamcity so far please share your experiences)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are about to spend money you might consider looking into teamcity. You get Idea code inspections and maven2 serverside. </p>
<p>.oO(Since I did not test teamcity so far please share your experiences)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 11/21 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk

Served from: codemonkeyism.com @ 2012-05-17 10:00:28 -->
