5 Practices Better to Change in Your Scrum Implementation

Photo by royskeane

Scrum saw a big increase in adoption last year. Everyone who is doing Scrum, does it differently as Scrum is a framework, not a process. One needs to inspect and adapt, mostly through retrospectives and daily improvements. I’ve been an agile proponent since learning about XP in the 90s and had the chance to learn something about Scrum in the last years and positions.

It is hard to determine if someone is really doing Scrum, the famous Nokia test helps as a Litmus test. Jeff Sutherland writes:

In 2005, Certified Scrum Trainer Bas Vodde was coaching teams at Nokia Networks in Finland and developed the first Nokia test focused on Agile practices. He had hundreds of teams and wanted a simple way to determine if each team was doing the basics.

I’m certain Scrum needs to adapt. As I’m head of development at a startup, and a ScrumMaster, I had some canditates for a Java job and they’ve asked me about Scrum. I’ve told them we aren’t doing Scrum by the book. They’ve been suprised and thought we do Scrum-Butt:

Scrumbutt is a word for the organisations saying or at least thinking that they are using Scrum, but the fact is that they are only using parts of the method. It is when a user of Scrum is saying: “YES! We use SCRUM, BUT we have these deviations in our method…”

But there are two sides beside Scrum. Doing not enough Scrum – ScrumButt. And learning from Scrum and going beyond – especially more lean. I think we are more lean and beyond basic Scrum. How did I adapt Scrum?

1. No Review Meetings

Scrum has a review meeting at the end of each sprint to present the work done to all interested parties.

What we do: We have no review meetings. Reviews with customers/product owner are done right after a story is completed together with the developers.

Pro: Con:
  • Completed stories can go faster into testing
  • Completed stories can be deployed faster and go live earlier
  • It’s harder for other stakeholders to see the stories
  • It’s harder for the team to promote it’s work

2. No estimation of hours

Scrum estimates the hours remaining on each task card for each story. Those estimates are updated each daily scrum and drawn on a burndown chart.

What we do: We do not estimate hours.

Pro: Con:
  • Less work to do, so less time wasted on something which is – often – not needed, less waste
  • Updates of hours are done by one developer and therefor are more inaccurate
  • Harder to see if the time remaining in a sprint matches the work remaining
  • Developers are not bound by their hour estimates and tasks may take longer

3. No hour burn down chart

In Scrum remaining work in hours is drawn on a burn down chart.

What we do: We draw two graphs, story points remaining and tasks remaining

Pro: Con:
  • Less waste, as it’s easier to count SP and tasks than hours
  • Graph of tasks remaining shows if the sprint goal can be reached or if the team is behind
  • Story points remaining show that a team finishes stories too late in the sprint
  • Harder to see if the time remaining in a sprint matches the work remaining

4. We do not use Velocity for Sprint Planning

In Scrum some teams use the past velocity for planning the number of stories for the sprint.

What we do: We pull stories from the backlog. After each story was discussed during planning, the ScrumMaster asks the team if they can do this story in the next sprint. Go on until they say no.

Pro: Con:
  • Developers are not fixed on a number and therefor are more likely to improve
  • Velocity should increase in teams, if retrospektives are effective. So why focus exclusivly on past performance?
  • Because they are more aggressive with what they can do, developers may overestimate their abilities

5. We split the backlog into stories that are in planning and those that are ready for development

Scrum has a product backlog with stories and most of the time estimations. They are ordered top to bottom according to business value.

What we do: We add (at least) one more state. All stories which are ready for development are put in a “Ready” queue.

Pro: Con:
  • The team sees which stories are ready for development
  • The company sees if the ready queue is too large or grows too fast
  • More work for the ProductOwner, possible additional waste

I hope one or two things on the list get you thinking about your Scrum implementation and helps you to smooth your process and increase customer satisfication. What changes to Scrum have you applied? I would be interested to hear, please leave a comment.

194 thoughts on “5 Practices Better to Change in Your Scrum Implementation”

  1. Pingback: best
  2. Pingback: fucoxanthin
  3. Pingback: geniux pills
  4. Pingback: intelligex
  5. Pingback: intellux
  6. Pingback: probrain
  7. Pingback: supreme antler
  8. Pingback: genius reviews
  9. Pingback: testomax
  10. Pingback: alpha f1
  11. Pingback: alpha fuel
  12. Pingback: alpha man pro
  13. Pingback: alpha xtrm
  14. Pingback: caralluma extract
  15. Pingback: anabolic rx24
  16. Pingback: cognifocus
  17. Pingback: garcinia melt
  18. Pingback: max synapse
  19. Pingback: nerventrax
  20. Pingback: nutra forskolin
  21. Pingback: testorip
  22. Pingback: zynev
  23. Pingback: pro forskolin
  24. Pingback: garcinia cleanse
  25. Pingback: garcinia xt
  26. Pingback: vitapulse
  27. Pingback: Vita pulse
  28. Pingback: vitapulse reviews
  29. Pingback: vitapulse review
  30. Pingback: pure colon detox
  31. Pingback: somnapure
  32. Pingback: perfect biotics
  33. Pingback: reviews vitapulse
  34. Pingback: vitapulse vitamins
  35. Pingback: vitapulse scam
  36. Pingback: vitapulse
  37. Pingback: vitapulse
  38. Pingback: vita pulse
  39. Pingback: traits
  40. Pingback: Sciatica SOS scam
  41. Pingback: How To Cure ED
  42. Pingback: Ecomaxx Reviews
  43. Pingback: T90 Xplode Reviews
  44. Pingback: Maxtropin Review
  45. Pingback: Tai Cheng
  46. Pingback: MegaDrox
  47. Pingback: Test X180 Reviews
  48. Pingback: Test X180 Review
  49. Pingback: vita pulse
  50. Pingback: recapture 360
  51. Pingback: probiotics america
  52. Pingback: drones for sale
  53. Pingback: check my blog
  54. Pingback: Check This Out
  55. Pingback: navigate here
  56. Pingback: Homepage
  57. Pingback: this contact form
  58. Pingback: see it here
  59. Pingback: ZCode System
  60. Pingback: click here now
  61. Pingback: find more
  62. Pingback: visit
  63. Pingback: my site
  64. Pingback: directory
  65. Pingback: her latest blog
  66. Pingback: check it out
  67. Pingback: click
  68. Pingback: original site
  69. Pingback: her latest blog
  70. Pingback: check it out
  71. Pingback: more info here
  72. Pingback: original site
  73. Pingback: 60 day fix review
  74. Pingback: read more
  75. Pingback: click here
  76. Pingback: tires
  77. Pingback: rims
  78. Pingback: wheels
  79. Pingback: click here
  80. Pingback: click here
  81. Pingback: click here
  82. Pingback: click here
  83. Pingback: read more

Comments are closed.