Comments on: ActiveMQ vs. Jabber http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/ Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:49:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ActiveMQ vs. Jabber XMPP — ActiveMQ Support http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-251648 ActiveMQ vs. Jabber XMPP — ActiveMQ Support Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:25:40 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-251648 [...] to a blog entry by Stephan Schmidt (@codemonkeyism on twitter). Stephan compares the Jabber and ActiveMQ to decide [...] [...] to a blog entry by Stephan Schmidt (@codemonkeyism on twitter). Stephan compares the Jabber and ActiveMQ to decide [...]

]]> By: Dejan Bosanac http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-251581 Dejan Bosanac Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:18:02 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-251581 Hi Stephen, nice writeup. Just wanted to point you to a few things: - you can try ActiveMQ 5.3.0 as it improves broker scalability in great deal. Take a look here for some more details http://www.nighttale.net/activemq/python-messaging-activemq-and-rabbitmq.html#scalability - Not sure if you checked ActiveMQ XMPP support http://activemq.apache.org/xmpp.html - you can use for debugging Cheers Hi Stephen,

nice writeup. Just wanted to point you to a few things:

- you can try ActiveMQ 5.3.0 as it improves broker scalability in great deal. Take a look here for some more details http://www.nighttale.net/activemq/python-messaging-activemq-and-rabbitmq.html#scalability

- Not sure if you checked ActiveMQ XMPP support http://activemq.apache.org/xmpp.html – you can use for debugging

Cheers

]]> By: andy.edmonds.be › Messaging and Infrastructure Management http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-225318 andy.edmonds.be › Messaging and Infrastructure Management Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:23:52 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-225318 [...] messaging protocol in this type of environment, some arguing how AMQP [5] might be a better choice [6][7][8], and others comparing HTTP versus XMPP [9][10]. Indeed, Roy Fieldings makes the point in one [...] [...] messaging protocol in this type of environment, some arguing how AMQP [5] might be a better choice [6][7][8], and others comparing HTTP versus XMPP [9][10]. Indeed, Roy Fieldings makes the point in one [...]

]]> By: SLA@SOI » Blog Archive » Messaging and Infrastructure Management http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-225317 SLA@SOI » Blog Archive » Messaging and Infrastructure Management Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:57:10 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-225317 [...] messaging protocol in this type of environment, some arguing how AMQP [5] might be a better choice [6][7][8], and others comparing HTTP versus XMPP [9][10]. Indeed,  Roy Fieldings makes the point in [...] [...] messaging protocol in this type of environment, some arguing how AMQP [5] might be a better choice [6][7][8], and others comparing HTTP versus XMPP [9][10]. Indeed,  Roy Fieldings makes the point in [...]

]]> By: andy.edmonds.be › links for 2009-01-25 http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-224826 andy.edmonds.be › links for 2009-01-25 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:40:25 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-224826 [...] ActiveMQ vs. Jabber | Code Monkeyism (tags: xmpp jabber messaging) This was written by andy. Posted on Monday, January 26, 2009, at 1:32 am. Filed under Delicious. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...] [...] ActiveMQ vs. Jabber | Code Monkeyism (tags: xmpp jabber messaging) This was written by andy. Posted on Monday, January 26, 2009, at 1:32 am. Filed under Delicious. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]

]]> By: Mladen http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-224404 Mladen Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:49:52 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-224404 Thx, this helps me a lot :-) Thx, this helps me a lot :-)

]]> By: stephan http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-224252 stephan Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:50:23 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-224252 Yes, found Smack also easy to use. Good library. Yes, found Smack also easy to use. Good library.

]]> By: Carsten http://codemonkeyism.com/activemq-vs-jabber/comment-page-1/#comment-224251 Carsten Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:00:48 +0000 http://stephan.reposita.org/?p=169#comment-224251 I played around with the Smack API a few months ago and was very surprised about the ease of use. Not that I have an actual use case for it, but it's a nice thought to use this protocols for real code that is *not* a messenger. I played around with the Smack API a few months ago and was very surprised about the ease of use. Not that I have an actual use case for it, but it’s a nice thought to use this protocols for real code that is *not* a messenger.

]]>